Hi all Attached are the community powers papers combined into one document, and benefiting from the latest legal review and updates following our last call. This is for discussion in our next CCWG call/s. *I draw your attention in particular to two points:* ** in the *"removing individual ICANN directors"* paper (section 5B.3) there was no limit on the number of times people could seek the removal of a director: if a vote failed, a new petition could happen immediately. *I have suggested there should be a standdown period of six months - if a vote to remove an individual director fails, a new petition could not be lodged.* It doesn't seem fair to allow the community to simply wear down an elected director by attrition like this. ** in *"recall of the ICANN Board" *paper (section 5B.4), there was a weirdness in the *petitioning*. We agreed that two SOs or ACs must petition to trigger this, at least one of which needed to be an SO, but the paper had a legacy oddness that 2/3 of the SOs and ACs would have to sign on to the petition. This was the same threshold as the actual decision. *So I have deleted it.* The changes to the Budget paper also clarify the separateness of decisions re IANA budget and ICANN budget. Redline and clean versions attached. Please treat the clean version as the authoritative one. The redline includes all changes other than formatting and minor word changes that don't change substance, as far as I know. cheers Jordan -- Jordan Carter Chief Executive *InternetNZ* +64-495-2118 (office) | +64-21-442-649 (mob) Email: jordan@internetnz.net.nz Skype: jordancarter *A better world through a better Internet *