On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all,
The notes, recordings and transcripts for the *CCWG ACCT Session 10* call on 03 February will be available here: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=51415000 *Action Items*
*- Upload/update your SOI using the wiki *
*- Encourage your communities to attend the engagement session*
*- Staff to post updated list of sessions on wiki *
*- Rapporteurs to confirm availability to join Chairs during engagement session*
*- Staff to assemble number of sessions where engagement with communities will take place*
*- Working Parties to send meeting requirements (if any) as soon as possible *
*- Co-chairs to ask for Board expectations and to coordinate with Bruce Tonkin (Board liaison) *
*- Circulate proposed agenda to list*
*- Read compilation of documents/information in preparation for Singapore sessions and identify any gaps *
*- Robin to send synopsis of a Bylaws mechanism*
*- WP2 is trying to organize its first call/meeting - a doodle poll will be circulated.*
*- ST-WP to provide draft examples in anticipation of Singapore discussions to understand what is meant by stress tests and collect feedback*
*- Be prepared for Singapore (agenda, invitations) *
*- Read all documents*
*- Keep respective groups informed of progress*
*- Continue debates on mailing list * *Notes*
*1. Welcome & roll call & SOI *
- SOIs are still missing.
*Action item*:
- Upload/update your SOI using the wiki
*2. Update from interactions with CWG *
- Response to CWG has been circulated. CCWG is now expecting feedback.
- CCWG-CWG leadership discussed how the groups may align thinking in terms of timeline, overall plan.
- CWG will issue a progress report in anticipation of Singapore
*3. Preparing Singapore *
* a. Reminder of sessions / logistics*
- Remote participation is available for all sessions
- Rapporteurs: join Co-chairs on stage during engagement session
- Thursday session will be also used to recap various messages received during week
*Action Items*:
- Encourage your communities to attend the engagement session
- Staff to post updated list of sessions on wiki
- Rapporteurs to confirm availability to join Chairs during engagement session
- Staff to assemble number of sessions where engagement with communities will take place
- Working Parties to send meeting requirements (if any) as soon as possible
* b. Agenda /topics for Board meeting *
- Topics for session with Board include: timeline; how CCWG proposal will be handled, any anticipated reasons why a proposal/part of a proposal might be refused, and the anticipated process following any such refusal; update on two WPs (communication empowerment - Review & Redress)
- Meeting with the Board will be posted on the meeting schedule along with remote participation details.
*Action Item*:
- Co-chairs to ask for Board expectations and to coordinate with Bruce Tonkin (Board liaison)
- Circulate proposed agenda to list
*c. Review of engagement material provided before meeting *
*Action Item*:
- Read compilation of documents/information in preparation for Singapore sessions and identify any gaps
*4. Update WP1/WP2 *
* a. By rapporteurs *
- WP1 has begun analyzing the mindmap and collecting requirements of inventory against identified mindmap requirements.
- 4 suggestions for structures that would empower the community were catalogued: 1) ad hoc SO/AC; 2) permanent community WG; 3) statutory members; 4)Supervisory Board
- Initial draft will be shared in advance of Singapore
- The WP is looking into scheduling a call to discuss modus operandi and establish a calendar of work. The WP indicated that an end date on WP work would be useful. End of March 2015 was flagged as the expected delivery date.
*Action item*:
- Robin to send synopsis of a Bylaws mechanism
- WP2 is trying to organize its first call/meeting - a doodle poll will be circulated.
* b. Update stress test WP *
- The wiki page captures the 25 contingencies merged into 5 different groups. A table serves to track where contingencies are. ST-WP will potentially hold a meeting in Singapore.
- Proposal to run stress tests against mechanisms - determine whether prevent consequences of stress test or mitigate/react
* c. Ideally, discussion around first set of answers to the contingency questions *
- Proposal is to start with stress tests and determine how the existing mechanism reacts and how envisioned mechanism would react.
- Suggestions of a gap analysis approach and an Exist & sufficient - Exist & insufficient approach were made.
*Action Item*:
- ST-WP to provide draft examples in anticipation of Singapore discussions to understand what is meant by stress tests and collect feedback
*5. Legal advice update*
- The task force has started building questions that should be asked to legal experts and awaiting questions from working parties.
- A shortlist was requested from CWG (awaiting reply); the group is coordinating with CWG on California law restrictions.
- Outcome will be shared with the group as soon as received.
-The CCWG welcomed advisor Lee Bygrave.
*6. A.O.B*
The following desired outcomes for Singapore were identified:
· Share advancement of work (WPs, requirements, contingencies
· Ensure we receive feedback from community, assess, adjust (as needed)
· Ensure timelines are appropriately synchronized (including with ICANN Board)
· Make substantive progress during two work sessions
· Ensure we are aligned with community's thinking
*7. Closing Remarks *
*Action Items*:
- Be prepared for Singapore (agenda, invitations)
- Read all documents
- Keep respective groups informed of progress
- Continue debates on mailing list
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- Sincerely CARRIE Devorah 562 688 2883 DISCLAIMER : With the continuing crossing and interfacing of platforms both on & off line both with & without our knowledge nor approval to note nothing sent over the Internet anymore is ever private nor should be presumed to be so. If it is that much of a secret, say nothing. If you must? Take a lesson from our military- hand write the note, chew then swallow
