Can staff go back and look at the history of this (in both published and internal versions)? This may be a case where the rule "assume nothing" should apply. On Tuesday, December 8, 2015, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net> wrote:
On 08/12/2015 14:40, David Post wrote:
I think we're all in agreement that it's the openness, stabiity, etc. of the DNS. So we should say that directly, adding the words "of the DNS" at the end.
Are we?
The NTIA transition requirements specify the need to maintain the "security, stability, and resiliency of the Internet DNS" but the "openness of the Internet."
-- Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523 Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/
London Internet Exchange Ltd Monument Place, 24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ
Company Registered in England No. 3137929 Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <javascript:;> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community