hi all, Martin: On 22 March 2015 at 18:22, Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk> wrote:
Hi Jordan, Your comment
In the end, between the CWG and the CCWG, we have to deal with the post-contract environment, and we have to have a genuinely multistakeholder solution for the overall oversight of the IANA functions. I don't think a customer-only CSC achieves that, and nor does an IAP - but they are parts of the general accountability puzzle for sure."
worries me.
It seems to imply that we need multi-stakeholder at every level.
I don't think that this is what the NTIA announcement says. Indeed i'd say Customer in CSC has a specific meaning and the CSC should work for customers to ensure good service.
I am sorry that it came across that way because I completely agree with you. I specifically do not think the customer committee has to be the multistakeholder body - my view is that it should be a customer committee. What I meant was that between CCWG and CWG, we also have to construct the multistakeholder oversight process, that is broader than the customers. HTH Jordan
Best
Martin
Sent from my iPhone
On 22 Mar 2015, at 15:03, Jordan Carter <jordan@internetnz.net.nz> wrote:
In the end, between the CWG and the CCWG, we have to deal with the post-contract environment, and we have to have a genuinely multistakeholder solution for the overall oversight of the IANA functions. I don't think a customer-only CSC achieves that, and nor does an IAP - but they are parts of the general accountability puzzle for sure.
-- Jordan Carter Chief Executive *InternetNZ* 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob) jordan@internetnz.net.nz Skype: jordancarter *A better world through a better Internet *