No Malcolm The Board just reminding that for the removal of the entire Board consensus agreement of 4 SO/AC is required . However, for cases that Board removal is invoked as results of action taken in regard with GAC advice and based in the recent compromise GAC is excluded from exercising its community power then there would remain 4 SO/AC for decision making then either 4 must agree or one objection criteria is used only 3 agreement would remain which does not meet the criteria of 4 in favour and not more than against That is all Regards Kavousd Sent from my iPhone
On 13 Feb 2016, at 17:17, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net> wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On 13 Feb 2016, at 16:12, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net> wrote:
What you are proposing would allow the GAC to participate in that decision
Or have I misunderstood? Was your proposed qualification limited only to qualifying Board removal power, not the other community powers? _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community