Dear Bruce What you said is right. I fully agree with you. Pls read my earléier message that the Board as an executive body shall not participate in nlegistative body ( Sole Mmember ) due to the fact that the begining of CCWG was Separation of Powers e.g. in a democratic Approach , the Hose Speaker can not be the prime Minister or a deputy can not be a Minister Regards Kavouss 2015-10-02 10:02 GMT+02:00 Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>:
Hello Arun,
To bring us back to Jordan's initial suggestion, if the Board were to play some role in the Single Member model - with the form of decision-making and areas of decision making clearly specified -- what would the Board's take be? Would it still oppose the SMCM?
That sounds a bit circular. i.e. the Board is a member of the member that is a member of ICANN. I guess an individual could be a Board director, and a member of the single member. Note though that in general if you are a Board director the bylaws don’t allow you to also be a Council member to keep a clear separation of roles.
It is currently possible to be a member of an Advisory Committee and be a Board director. I used to be a member of SSAC, and also a director on the board. However after discussion with Paul Vixie - I came to the conclusion that it was better not to be a member of both to avoid perceptions of conflict of interest. So for at least a year I ceased being active in SSAC, and elected not to put my name forward for re-appointment to SSAC.
Regards, Bruce Tonkin
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community