I think the answer lies here: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-dt/2014-December/000123.html where it clearly states that you are not one of the 5 GAC "members" but "been appointed as ICG liaison to the CCWG" which from the context I assume means CCWG-Accountability. Why don't you take this up with your GAC chair, Mr Schneider? el On 2014-12-09 11:45 , Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
Dear All, Sorry my connection was interrupted two times, I repeat Dear All
Most of the thing foreseen to be done are directly related to ICG activities . I do not understand how the repreventatives of ICG would be given the right to take part in consensus building.The confusion came from the message sent by Thomas in his announcement that it did not make it clear that I am among the 5 members of GAC ,REPRESTING ICG. There are problems in the whole process. I agree with Richard that it is impossible that more than 150 people attend a live virtual meeting of one hour. I am not aware of the process in CWG but in ICG only the members raise hand and ask for the floor. I do not see any light at the end of the CCWG Tunnel. I need clarification from chair and corrective measures from Thomas to announce me as he should have announced it Regards Kavouss
[...]