-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I agree that this is unfortunate. For me this conflicts with an IETF meeting that I was going to co-chair a session at. So unless we hold it in Dallas, I have a problem. avri On 17-Feb-15 08:30, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
Dear All, May I respectfully recall that I did appeal to all of you to kindly exclude 22 March to 05 April 2015 .It it possible to do it before or after that period. Regards Kavouss
2015-02-17 9:58 GMT+01:00 Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.na <mailto:el@lisse.na>>:
Thank you, this confirms what was said during today's call.
I need the info for the May F2F...
greetings, el
-- Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
> On Feb 17, 2015, at 09:44, Adam Peake <adam.peake@icann.org <mailto:adam.peake@icann.org>> wrote: > > Dear Eberhard, > > The intention is to hold the next CCWG face-to-face meeting on 23-24 > March. Please consider the dates as fixed, I would be surprised if they > change. > > Location to be confirmed, ICANN meeting staff is looking at European > cites, international airline hubs. Please bear with us, we hope to be > able to confirm by the end of this week. > > Thank you, > > Adam > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.NA> > Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 5:09 PM > To: CCWG Accountability <accountability-cross-community@icann.org <mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org>> > Cc: Lisse Eberhard <directors@omadhina.net <mailto:directors@omadhina.net>> > Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG-Accountability F2F > All,
Can we please publish the dates of all planned Face-to-Face meetings immediately?
Some of us work for a living and re-arranging my practice schedule for one is a real nuisance unless I know well in advance.
March is already an issue for me and I doubt I will be able to make it even by remote participation (as it is in the same time zone) but I need to especially know about May, so I can block this out.
2015-05-01 and 2015-05-04 are public holidays here in Namibia and this year very pleasantly located. So if it was 2015-05-04/05 <tel:2015-05-04%2F05> it would not interfere much. If not it'll be not too bad, as long as I know well in advance.
Location is not so much of importance, especially if it is in a major hub, but if it could be narrowed down to the hub as soon as possible it would help with keeping airfare costs down by early booking.
greetings, el >> _______________________________________________ >> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list >> Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU43YAAAoJEOo+L8tCe36HFS0H/2BXcJb+Q+NlpiI4mmkgNBiV hKDqVoXHGeKaqNMUJ3Gr/v0ex98N27ibtCCZAhGOgj3HJQAh97qqdO+Y+I1/wr+w DT00sEjapjjjkMDx/QPKSZ62AgI1LxqJbEco0/ydIiYygztfz1r01GtoIUnxfDjU 8ZlbpGL44wSkThegEITw4vqEnFJnuy2v2fmircKENz5YWmJ53c673hOKKk4tThKz m0t79qTrWoWBcfeYTqKDuFQS8ixNNc1r/UxyB6qw4VFM35xJ/BypkMNLqCxI2Lau 65E7XlntBmK0mau6nsIxaC8riLn4CyKbCUCaMhxIkDaJkg37u0QvQ0sxmGImH4s= =Hqhr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----