They confirmed to co-chairs when we met them in BA. Pls work on the assumption they will not vote. Do not exclude them from joining discussions, though. Same for SSAC. Thomas ======== rickert.net PS - Sent from my cell. Please excuse typos and brevity.
Am 26.07.2015 um 21:23 schrieb Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>:
Do we have formal confirmation from the RSSAC that they are happy with being excluded. The last I heard, Lyman said he was pretty sure that was their position, but that he could not formally speak on their behalf.
Simlarly, we should have formal confirmation from the other groups that they are prepared to participate. I can give that on behalf of the ALAC.
Alan
At 26/07/2015 01:24 AM, Jordan Carter wrote:
Hi everyone
Here is an update of the previously not-updated text on voting weights. I am sorry that I haven’t got tracked changes to show you - it’s not much changed from what was circulated a few days ago (the redline staff draft that hadn’t actually been finished).
We still need to develop quorum and participation rules - I believe Bernie is working on a paper on this, for discussion next week.
This is on the agenda for WP1 on 27 July.
best Jordan
-- Jordan Carter
Chief Executive InternetNZ
04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob) jordan@internetnz.net.nz Skype: jordancarter
To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community