Yes that is right León. -----Original Message----- From: León Felipe Sánchez Ambía [mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx] Sent: Sunday, 14 February 2016 6:38 AM To: Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net> Cc: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>; Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Board comments on Board removal in the context of GAC advice Dear Malcolm, As I read it, and please, Bruce, correct me if I’m wrong, this only refers to whole Board removal power and not the rest of community powers so it would leave compromise language intact but clarifying the point in Rec 2 to this end. Best regards, León
El 13/02/2016, a las 10:17 a.m., Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net> escribió:
Sent from my iPhone
On 13 Feb 2016, at 16:12, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net> wrote:
What you are proposing would allow the GAC to participate in that decision
Or have I misunderstood? Was your proposed qualification limited only to qualifying Board removal power, not the other community powers? _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community