All, as I mentioned in my previous e-mail to the list, let us discuss the issue during the upcoming call. It is a bit unfortunate that there is so much suspicion. I am sure we will be able to put most, if not all, concerns at rest. Some will be disappointed that there are no evil forces at work. Talk to you in a few hours. Best, Thomas
Am 31.05.2016 um 17:46 schrieb Paul Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com>:
Why is anyone surprised that those holding the resources are going to constrain you? It is in ICANN's corporate interest to limit outside review.
If we were serious about the process we would ask ICANN for a top line # for how much it is willing to spend on the WS2 process and then WE would decide how to allocate it: transcription; travel support; legal support; whatever. I have no real problem with ICANN setting an overall budget (subject, of course, to the new EC budget review powers). But allocation and priority setting should be by the CCWG.
Paul
Paul Rosenzweig paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com O: +1 (202) 547-0660 M: +1 (202) 329-9650 VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739 www.redbranchconsulting.com My PGP Key
-----Original Message----- From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 9:11 AM To: Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net>; accountability-cross-community@icann.org Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG-Accountability - WS2 Presentation for meeting tomorrow - Minor corrections
Without commenting on the specifics of the issues (whether staff note taking or transcriptions or whatever), the entire discussion on costs started with us being told that we had exceeded our budget, a budget we were not aware of, did not know what it covered, and had absolutely no handle on what the costs were that were associated with it.
I would have hoped that this time around, if we were making cost vs benefit decisions, we would not only be told the "decision", but also made aware of the specific costs that were being deemed to be too high and thus eliminated.
VERY tiresome.
Alan
At 31/05/2016 04:02 AM, Nigel Roberts wrote:
I support Avri, Marilyn et al on transcription.
The lack of transcription is a direct attack on the ability of non-native speakers to participate, whether unintentional or intentional.
But I'll really not surprised.
On 31/05/16 05:27, Harold Arcos wrote:
Hello Avri, everyone
I join in the thanks of Carlos towards Avri regarding noted lack of the transcription. Her POV is more than right because the reading allow follow much better the argumentative process.
I agree with your question and I joinv
Kind regards
Harold Arcos +58 4129982820 skp: harcos0912
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:17 PM, avri doria <avri@apc.org <mailto:avri@apc.org>> wrote:
Hi,
I would like to question the non transcription decision.
Especially in the case where the participants are responsible for both participating and making sure all discussed issues are included, the transcription is important. It also helps those for whom English is not a first language, who read better than they parse peoples varying accents and pronunciations.
avri
On 30-May-16 11:46, Bernard Turcotte wrote:
All,
Minor corrections to the slides on WS2 attached.
B.
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community