Too much process. Unnecessary voting. Over-involvement of entire community. Kieren On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net> wrote:
+1 to this.
Subsidarity, please,. Each SO should decide how to remove it own directors, which, potentially could be any of the models I mentioned. It should merely be required to notify ICANN Board in a certain formal way when it has so determined to remove.
On 19/10/15 15:47, Jordan Carter wrote:
IN all of our work on decisions internal to an SO or, we have taken a hands-off view - that the SO or AC itself should use the processes it uses.
If we need to move off that, we should decide that ASAP. And tell the SOs/ACs.
Jordan
On 19 October 2015 at 15:27, Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net> wrote:
On 19/10/15 15:15, Chris Disspain wrote:
The relevant SO/AC then makes a decision. Removal of the Director
requires a 75% majority in the relevant SO/AC.
75% of what?
(a) All Council members? (b) Council Members voting (c) All SO Members? (d) SO Members casting a vote
At least one of these would appear, in practice, to be unlikely in the extreme to ever be triggered.
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community