This is not merely a moving target, it is a transforming one. That is not merely a slight deviation from the typical and inevitable ICANN moving target, it is a whole different kettle of fish. Greg On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
Hi,
AOC reviews are always against a moving target. ICANN generally does not stop doing stuff during an AOC review.
avri
On 29-Jun-15 11:46, Greg Shatan wrote:
2. _Interplay between Accountability Work and AoC Reviews_: The AoC reviews will be reviewing a moving target, as the work of the CWG and CCWG changes ICANN. The AoC itself may disappear (subsumed in large part into the bylaws) before the AoC reviews are completed. New bylaws, processes and structures will make it difficult to review ICANN in midstream -- are these reviews of ICANN before, during or after IANA/Accountability changes -- or all 3? Of course, this would need to be worked out with NTIA, not declared unilaterally (but I don't think anyone was suggesting that). In any event, we are best placed to consider the interplay between our work and the AoC reviews.
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community