@Avri +100 Thanks for taking note that some/many do not have English as “legal” tongue, and neither can they give a perfectly formulate opinion during the call “live”, nor do they have the skills to edit the transcript in the comment period until next call. In my view it should not be 100% responsibility of Staff to write discussions/agreements down. Each WG leader should also be responsible for some level of editorial quality. Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On 30 May 2016, at 10:17, avri doria wrote:
Hi,
I would like to question the non transcription decision.
Especially in the case where the participants are responsible for both participating and making sure all discussed issues are included, the transcription is important. It also helps those for whom English is not a first language, who read better than they parse peoples varying accents and pronunciations.
avri
On 30-May-16 11:46, Bernard Turcotte wrote:
All,
Minor corrections to the slides on WS2 attached.
B.
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community