Isn't the meeting required prior to finalizing the bylaws? Is there a new timeline for publishing the public review? -----Original Message----- From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mathieu Weill Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 4:29 PM To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Cc: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] TR: [bylaws-coord] Explanation of grandfathered agreements Dear Alissa, The meeting has not taken place yet. We have requested availability information from Icann Legal, but have not received a response yet, most probably because of the rush to finalize the bylaws. The meeting is planned to be announced on this list of course. Best Mathieu -----Message d'origine----- De : Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa@cooperw.in] Envoyé : mercredi 20 avril 2016 21:46 À : Mathieu Weill Cc : accountability-cross-community@icann.org Objet : Re: [CCWG-ACCT] TR: [bylaws-coord] Explanation of grandfathered agreements Does the circulation of this memo mean that the meeting of parties interested in this issue (discussed on the April 12 CCWG call and noted in Bernard’s April 14 email) took place already? Are there minutes or a transcript available from that meeting? Thanks, Alissa
On Apr 20, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill@afnic.fr> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
Please find attached a memo from our lawyers, in response to our request regarding Section 1.1 (d) of the Bylaws (so called "grandfathering" provisions).
Best, Mathieu
-----Message d'origine----- De : bylaws-coord-bounces@icann.org [mailto:bylaws-coord-bounces@icann.org] De la part de Rosemary E. Fei Envoyé : mercredi 20 avril 2016 10:05 À : bylaws-coord@icann.org Cc : ICANN-Adler; Daniel Halloran (daniel.halloran@icann.org); Sidley ICANN CCWG (sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com); Amy Stathos (amy.stathos@icann.org) Objet : [bylaws-coord] Explanation of grandfathered agreements
Dear Bylaws Coordination Group:
During the CCWG call on April 12, Mathieu noted that, in order to approve the proposed Bylaws, the CCWG would need an explanation for the unanimous decision among the Sidley and Adler firms and ICANN Legal to include specified agreements and the current Strategic and Operating Plans in the list of "grandfathered" documents in Section 1.1(d)(ii) of the draft Bylaws circulated on April 7, 2016. The explanation, approved by all three counsels, is attached, in Word and pdf formats. Please distribute to the full CCWG list, if you deem that appropriate.
Please let us know if you need any further information on this point.
Rosemary, Holly, and John <Explanation of Grandfathering Provisions at Section 1.doc><Explanation of grandfathered agreements (00788389xA3536).pdf><Pièce jointe sans titre 02233.txt>_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community