Thank you, Thunderbird is getting the better of me :-)-O Now we are saying we only do what we are not afraid of rather than what is right? el On 2015-07-30 11:38, Jordan Carter wrote:

Hi Eberhard,

It appears you are posting to a list that isn't the CCWG list - I'm posting to the same, I don't know who is on it.

You do seem to have a radically different idea as to what the purpose of the group was. If we had started intervening in the things that Keith listed as us not doing, all hell would surely have broken loose?

best Jordan

On 30 July 2015 at 20:03, Dr Eberhard Lisse <el@lisse.na <mailto:el@lisse.na>> wrote:

Dear Co-Chairs,

I am going to quote the first paragraph in my minority viewpoint because it explains the failure of the CCWG Accountability in two sentences.

The second paragraph, which I have separated from the first for ease of reference is painfully absurd.

greetings, el

On 2015-07-30 07:09, Drazek, Keith wrote: [...] > I think it's also important to note the proposal currently under > discussion changes nothing about ICANN's day-to-day, > month-to-month, or even year-to-year operations and community > engagement structures. Only in very rare cases would the proposed > Sole Member community empowerment model come into play.

> In my opinion, its existence would be a powerful deterrent to bad > behavior and would therefore become an available but largely > unneeded tool. [...]

-- [...]