Chris, thanks for forwarding. This will be helpful input as we continue working towards a consensus recommendation. Regards, Keith From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Chris Disspain Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 7:51 AM To: CCWG Accountability Cc: John Curran Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: Designator-based Empowered SO/AC model Importance: High All, FYI from John Curran. Cheers, Chris Begin forwarded message: From: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org<mailto:jcurran@istaff.org>> Subject: Designator-based Empowered SO/AC model Date: 25 June 2015 19:40:43 AEST To: Milton L Mueller <mueller.syr.edu@gmail.com<mailto:mueller.syr.edu@gmail.com>>, Becky Burr <Becky.Burr@neustar.biz<mailto:Becky.Burr@neustar.biz>>, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.co<mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.co>>, Chris Disspain <ceo@auda.org.au<mailto:ceo@auda.org.au>>, Athina Fragkouli <athina.fragkouli@ripe.net<mailto:athina.fragkouli@ripe.net>> Milton, Becky, Seun, Chris, Athina - Please excuse the widespread nature of this email, but I am not a “participant” of the CCWG and thus must seek an ally in order to facilitate discussion of an an alternative model for formulation of the "empowered SO/AC model”. I provide the attached presentation not as a formal proposal, but an a comparative model that might allow the CCWG to better understand the benefits and potential issues with the member-based “Empowered SO/AC model”. I am no longer in Buenos Aires, but I would greatly appreciate it if one of you could provide this information to the CCWG mailing list, and present it for discussion in a working session. It is my hope that this will allow better understanding of the nature of community powers versus legal rights of enforcement (two concepts that have been somewhat co-mingled in the ongoing discussion.) Feel free to forward this email publicly as necessary. Thank you in advance for your consideration! /John John Curran Internet staff Disclaimer: my views alone