I read the submissions in their entirety. So far as I see, they conform to previously public positions taken by the ALAC in context, all of which had my support. My positions remain, unchanged. I do not think these positions require a formal vote. -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>wrote:
The PDP WG on special protection for IGO/INGO names has requested that ACs and SOs submit comments on a number of questions related to special protections of IGO/INGO names.
Evan and I were asked to draft a statement for the consideration and possible approval of the ALAC and it can be found at https://community.icann.org/x/**5IFQAg<https://community.icann.org/x/5IFQAg>. Input was requested to be submitted by 08 January 2013, but there should be no problem with getting it in a bit later.
Evan is travelling at the moment, but his contributions were substantive and the document has his support. We both believe that it conforms well to positions previously taken by the ALAC.
I am not sure if Olivier wants to subject this statement to a formal ALAC vote. In my mind, it does not need a formal vote, but we do need to ensure that it (or what it gets revised to) does conform to general ALAC feelings. So please post your comments to the Wiki.
A copy is attached here for your convenience.
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)