Olivier I would go for option B as this creates a one stop shop for sponsorship for all RALOS and in my opinion makes it easier going forward to organise At Large events. It also avoids duplication of efforts and basically having to re-invent the wheel each time a RALO has a GA or any other At Large event that requires sponsorship. My two cents Beran Sent from my iPhone
On 7 Oct 2016, at 15:24, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> wrote:
Dear ALAC members,
The ATLAS II Implementation Task Force is actively following up on the ATLAS II Recommendations contained in the At-Large Declaration drafted during the second At-Large Summit that took place in London in June 2014.
I would like to draw your attention to Recommendation 41: Ref. https://community.icann.org/x/dpZCAw The ALAC should work with the ICANN Board in seeking additional sources of funding for At-Large activities.
The ATLAS II IT fleshed this recommendation out to mean that the ALAC would work with the Global Stakeholder Engagement Team on sponsorship issues.
The ALAC will be meeting with the Global Stakeholder Engagement (GSE) Team in Hyderabad.
A. Should the ALAC discuss with the GSE about raising external funds and getting sponsors? Y/N B. Should an At-Large taskforce be established to tackle sponsorship issues, including the development of the sponsor database? This taskforce would bring all RALO leaderships together to give them tools to help them with raising sponsorship for F2F GAs, showcases, etc. Y/N
Looking forward to your kind responses.
Warmest regards,
Olivier
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)