I believe the at-large public has an interest in the consideration of fast-flux usage. I do not believe that the charter of this particular group was well formulated to help that investigation. I'd say that if ALAC supports re-constitution of a fast-flux working group, we should urge that it focus precisely on whether and how one might distinguish between abusive and benign uses of fast-flux techniques. Thanks, --Wendy Brendler, Beau wrote:
Brief update: It appears this WG has stalled for the foreseeable future. The chairman, Mike O'Connor, has resigned. Avri Doria sent a message this morning telling the participants to await next steps, but the WG had pretty much stalled in process already.
Bureaucratic processes are not my strong suit, but should the ALAC create a short statement of advisory that we believe this is an important issue, provide some framework and definition, and encourage the GNSO to re-constitute the group?
Beau
-- Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@seltzer.org Visiting Professor, American University Washington College of Law Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html http://www.chillingeffects.org/ https://www.torproject.org/