Tijani: We have an opportunity here to define our own "program" which includes criteria, selection process and expectations. I want to add that we need some way in evaluating the result of this program so going forward we can weed out what does not work and embrace/enhance what works. -ed On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 1:58 AM Tijani BEN JEMAA < tijani.benjemaa@benjemaa.com> wrote:
Understand your concern Olivier if we conceive the COP on one single year. Glenn, if the mentorship consists in attending sessions, it can’t lead to on boarding. Perhaps we need to define first the objective of the program.
I know it’s too complex. It is because the staff conceived a program without consulting the community, and now, we have to take over something that we didn’t discuss the objectives, the expected outcome and the process.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- *Tijani BEN JEMAA* Executive Director Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*) Phone: +216 98 330 114 <+216%2098%20330%20114> +216 52 385 114 <+216%2052%20385%20114>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Le 25 nov. 2017 à 04:30, Satish Babu <sb@inapp.com> a écrit :
Dear all,
APRALO has been silent through these discussions, as we already have our own Mentoring program which was considered reasonably successful (although it had no funding). We were planning to continue our program into its second edition.
Now that the Onboarding Program is gathering momentum, we are exploring how we can dovetail our program into the OP. Maureen and Holly will report back in the forthcoming ALAC call with our suggestions.
satish
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> wrote:
I wonder if they have content that is different for each of the successive sessions. If the mentees sit through the same sessions each ICANN meeting it becomes rather pointless G
Glenn McKnight NARALO Secretariat mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight 289-830 6259 <(289)%20830-6259> .
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> wrote:
Dear Tijani,
On 24/11/2017 23:25, Tijani BEN JEMAA wrote:
This was the program administrator opinion. But do we feel it will be enough???? For the record, the first pilot program took 4 to 5 consecutive ICANN meetings with the same mentees. I do believe that the continuity is an essential element of success.
I am not disputing that. But with an already funded Mentor, two mentees per meeting x 3 meetings = 6 slots in total. We have 5 RALOs. If we follow the "4 or 5 consecutive ICANN meetings" strategy, some RALOs will not benefit from the Onboarding program at all. Kindest regards,
Olivier
_______________________________________________ Secretariat mailing list Secretariat@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/secretariat
Secretariat wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/OpQi
_______________________________________________ Secretariat mailing list Secretariat@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/secretariat
Secretariat wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/OpQi
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)