You know what -- you're right! I thought it was actually differently worded because of its filename. NGPC definitely confused. In any case, I have asked for a response on the other Statement. Kind regards, Olivier On 21/09/2013 19:07, Tijani BEN JEMAA wrote:
Olivier,
The attached file is exactly the same as the previous one
Tijani
-----Message d'origine----- De : alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] De la part de Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Envoyé : samedi 21 septembre 2013 23:10 À : ALAC Working List Objet : [ALAC] Fwd: Correction: Response to the ALAC Statements on Community Applications
Dear ALAC,
please be so kind to find attached the response from the Chair of the NGPC to my earlier reply. I have since replied that our Statement on "Community Expertise in Community Priority Evaluation" (AL-ALAC-ST-0813-03-00-EN) still stands and we look forward to a response from the NGPC on this matter. Kind regards,
Olivier
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Correction: Response to the ALAC Statements on Community Applications Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 08:40:39 -0700 From: Cherine Chalaby <cherine.chalaby@*.org> To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@*.com>
Dear Olivier, Please ignore the previous email. I sent you the wrong attachment. Please find attached the correct response from the NGPC. Thanks Cherine
From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com>> Date: Saturday, 21 September 2013 14:24 To: Cherine Mohsen Chalaby <cherine.chalaby@icann.org <mailto:cherine.chalaby@icann.org>> Cc: Steve Crocker <Steve@shinkuro.com <mailto:Steve@shinkuro.com>>, Secretary <secretary@icann.org <mailto:secretary@icann.org>>, ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com>> Subject: Re: Response to the ALAC Statements on Community Applications
Dear Cherine,
thank you very much for your kind reply which I will forward to the ALAC for their information.
I should point out that the NGPC might be confused in their response regarding (1) "Community Expertise in Community Priority Evaluation" (AL-ALAC-ST-0813-03-00-EN). This Statement, attached, was actually sent to you and the NGPC. It was not sent to the Panel Firm.
The Statement which the ALAC has sent to the Panel Firm is another Statement entitled "ALAC Statement on the Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) Guidelines Update from ICANN" (AL-ALAC-ST-0913-01-00-EN). I enclose a copy of it here for your information - and you will notice it looks at the subject from an entirely different angle.
On behalf of the ICANN At-Large Advisory Committee, we look forward to the NGPC's response on the ALAC's "Community Expertise in Community Priority Evaluation" Statement.
Best regards,
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond ALAC Chair
On 21/09/2013 08:29, Cherine Chalaby wrote:
Dear Olivier,
On behalf of the New gTLD Program Committee (NGPC), I thank you for providing the two recent ALAC Statements regarding: (1) Community Expertise in Community Priority Evaluation; and (2) Preferential Treatment for Community Applications in String Contention. The NGPC appreciates the attention the ALAC has given to these two topics and has reviewed the statements carefully. The NGPC understands that additional detail regarding these topics may be sent to it in the near future.
Please find attached the full response of the NGPC to the ALAC Statements.
All the best,
Cherine
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html