I would suggest that this is better approached starting with a private conversation. I presume you mean an ALAC Liaison TO the GAC. I don't think there would be any interest (in the GAC) with the opposite. Alan At 02/03/2016 03:04 AM, Sébastien Bachollet wrote:
Maybe I ma late but can we add? Exchange of liaison between GAC and ALAC Thanks Skills are useful but diversity is essential.
Sébastien Bachollet +33 6 07 66 89 33 Blog: <http://sebastien.bachollet.fr>http://sebastien.bachollet.fr/ Mail: Sébastien Bachollet <<mailto:sebastien@bachollet.com>sebastien@bachollet.com>
De : <<mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org>alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Alan Greenberg <<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> Date : mercredi 2 mars 2016 05:05 À : ALAC <<mailto:alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org>alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Objet : [ALAC] Topics for ALAC-GAC Meeting
* Brief updates: * CCWG Accountability - current status with ALAC and GAC * New gTLD Safeguards * New ICANN meeting structure - impacts on GAC and ALAC * New gTLDs - Future Rounds - GNSO PDP The GAC may add additional items.
We will discuss further on the weekend.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)