Dear ALAC members, I have been contacted by the NCSG Chair, asking whether the ALAC would like to sign on this reconsideration request. With a turnaround of less than 48H, I asked the ALT for advice on this topic. The response I have received is that a reconsideration request is a serious procedure that would require the normal ratification process of the ALAC. I am therefore asking you whether the ALAC should consider supporting this reconsideration request. Kind regards, Olivier On 30/08/2014 05:48, Alan Greenberg wrote:
From: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au> To: "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] Reconsideration request Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 03:09:09 +0000
Hello All,
I note that a reconsideration request has been lodged regarding the accountability plan:
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-38-2014-08-29-en
See attached for a copy.
The request is on behalf of the:
- The Business Constituency;
- The Registries Stakeholder Group; and
- The Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group (NCSG)
Regardless of the formal consideration of this request, I remain open to hearing from any parts of the GNSO on how they would like to see the current accountability plan changed. I am happy to participate in a teleconference with any of the GNSO constituencies or stakeholder groups.
The ICANN staff have scheduled a meeting for:
Date: 2 September 2014
Location: ICEC in the Topkapi A Room, Istanbul, Turkey
Time: 06:00-07:30 UTC
I won't be at that meeting, but will be interested to follow what is said at that meeting by the community.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)