Hi I have no problem with the disclosure and Hong's comment is right that an email was sent from my end for this though I didn't access the poll option but instead sent in an email that I think is a valid approach too...... On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Hong Xue <hongxueipr@gmail.com> wrote:
FYI, Pakistan ICT Policy Monitor's email and preference have already been clearly announced along with the Poll result. See below announcement made on November 26.
"[a]n ALS that did not participate in the poll wrote to all Chairs, Secretariat and Staff to indicate its support for *Sébastien Bachollet. *Its opinion is also recorded."
Since the poll was anonymous, if Pakistan ICT Policy Monitor would not like to disclose its identity, I'm very sorry. The disclosure was made in response to direct allegation of the fairness of the poll.
Regards
Hong Xue
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Hong Xue <hongxueipr@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
APRALO Poll has been completely and result was announced on November 26. Please refer to my following announcement on the result.
Number of voters: 7 · Group size: 19 ·
Sébastien Bachollet 57.14% Alan Greenberg 42.86% Pierre Dandjinou 0%
With Sébastien having received more than 50% of first preferences in count 1, or 4 out of a total of 7 votes, it was not necessary to go to a second count.
After the poll was close, two ALSes that did not participate the poll wrote to me and staff to indicate their preferred candidates. These two ALSes are:
Pakistan ICT Policy Monitor, supporting *Sébastien Bachollet *; and,
Internet Users Society Niue, represented by Per Darnell since November 26, supporting *Alan Greenberg*.
Given that the purpose of the poll is to let all the ALSes to openly express their views, both "belated" messages were equally accepted, recored and *COUNTED*.
Therefore, totally 9 (7+2) ALSes indicated their preferences. 5 (4+1) prefer *Sébastien Bachollet, *4 (3+1) prefer *Alan Greenberg*.
Under such counting, Sébastien still received more than 50% of first preferences in count 1, or 5 out of a total of 9 votes, it was not necessary to go to a second count under STV.
I hope I've made whole process extremely transparent and ease any doubt about unfairness.
For whatever reason, any one is welcome to comment whether you want to either replace me in the vote or remove me from chair position, or both.
Regards
Hong Xue
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Hong Xue <hongxueipr@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
The STV poll to guide the APRALO Chair’s vote in the At-Large Board Director selection was quorate and ended with the following result:
*Sébastien Bachollet was elected in count 1. * With Sébastien having received more than 50% of first preferences in count 1, or 4 out of a total of 7 votes, it was not necessary to go to a second count.
The APRALO poll ended 24 November at 1000 UTC. ALAC-RALO Chair selection vote for At-Large Director ended on 25 November at 23:59 UTC. In order not to disturb the voting process, APRALO poll result was not released until the voting process ended just now.
APRALO Chair, Hong Xue, had casted her vote according to the APRALO poll result.
In addition, an ALS that did not participate in the poll wrote to all Chairs, Secretariat and Staff to indicate its support for *Sébastien Bachollet. *Its opinion is also recorded.
Regards
Hong Xue Chair of APRALO
-- Dr. Hong Xue Professor of Law Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/ <http://iipl.org.cn/> 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China
-- Dr. Hong Xue Professor of Law Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/ <http://iipl.org.cn/> 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China _______________________________________________ APAC-Discuss mailing list APAC-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss
Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org
-- Regards. -------------------------- Fouad Bajwa