Dear Cheryl and all, Thank you for sharing this in much detail as it adds to my knowledge as well about how the due diligence works. I believe it is crucial to note here that if the process got involved in checking with each individual their background, that would be first an invasion on one's privacy and secondly it would become a hassle for such a process to fulfill what it is objectively designed and structured to do. I want to take a brief moment here to explain how I look at applications for joining ALAC through APRALO: As far as Net Mission application is concerned I believe that since Siva was part of the ICANN fellowship program and there were "adopted fellows" this time from Net Mission in the San Francisco meeting, and I was able to attend most of those fellowship meetings as well as Olivier, the two participants from Net Mission did share quite some information during my interactions. I got to meet the group during the IGF in Lithuania as well. Its important to note that these young participants have found their path in ICANN through ALAC and APRALO. Another thing to note is that Net Mission Ambassadors are very vocal, transparent and public. Two members participated in the APRALO meeting and I believe Siva took the kind liberty of introducing them in the meeting. One of the ambassador, Michelle Qin has also blogged about her experience at http://join.ust.hk/blog/michelle-qin/40th-icann-conference-san-francisco. Interesting when we do a search with the names provided in the application such as Richard Cheng the following information pops up http://icannwiki.com/index.php/Richard_Cheng. Each member listed in the application displays significant participation within ICANN or IGF processes such as Bianca Ho was participating in the IGF and this the workshop officially approved and delivered: http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/chronocontact/?chronoformname=WSPro... If any of our members would like more proof, Net Mission's annual report is a very good evidence of what all these members do: http://www.ycig.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/NM-annual-report-2009-10-eng-.... In fact each member in that list has details on the web and if I wander to Yvonne Lee, search returns http://sites.google.com/site/yvonneseportfoliobackup/page. These members appear in very good standing, active and I would like to hear their young point of views on Internet user related issues. Personally speaking, checking on every member of a given ALS application would cause a breach of privacy and on an my own personal individual basis I would not support such a practice neither encourage it within APRALO though consensus is a separate subject. Maybe such would be otherwise if we initiated the inclusion of individual membership in the future because then an individual would have to go through due diligence. I still have to seek guidance from Cheryl and Olivier in this matter on how to structure such an option in my proposal to APRALO in the near future. I look forward to Net Mission's application receiving due diligence and it would indeed be a pleasure to meet up with these young leaders again in our interactions during the Singapore meeting. Take care all. -- Regards. -------------------------- Fouad Bajwa On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Siva what goes into being an ALS application form for ICANN is decided by ALAC and approved / negotiated with ICANN (usually Legal advise the Board on this) and ALAC go through considerable work with ICANN Legal on ramifications, purpose and effect of any such changes to ALS application forms and the processes associated with them...
FYI the last major overhaul of this system and forms started in 2007 at the LA Meeting and was completed in 2008... and was in part responding to a matter of complaint (against ALAC) that had been dealt with by the then ICANN Ombudsman... and it is from his recommendations that we also strive so carefully to review ALS applications in such a timely manner and have in the public record the status and progression of received applications.
So if a Region (such as APRALO) believe changes to or additional information is desirable to assist in the role that the RALO Officers have in conducting their part in the Regional Advice on an ALS applicant (which is done after the Due Diligence phase), then the way to get this to happen is to request the RALO to have these suggestions and the rational etc., for them brought forward to the ALAC and to request a process of ALS application form (and possible processing standards etc.,) set for a formal review...
Do let me know if I can assist APRALO with doing any of that...
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO)
On 6 April 2011 03:07, Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello
Could there be a section in the ALS application form the applicant to furnish a list of members, each listed with some basic particulars as their profession, the name of the organization they belong to, their position and contact information? That would give us an idea about the diversity of the member base of the proposed ALS.
Thank you.
Sivasubramanian M
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Fouad Bajwa <fouadbajwa@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Marilyn,
Thank you for the update on the application submission by Net Mission. We look forward to the due diligence completion and are positive about Net Mission Hong Kong's possible participation in APRALO.
Best
Fouad
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Marilyn Vernon <staff@atlarge.icann.org> wrote:
Dear all,
This is to inform you that we received an ALS application from Netmission.ASIA. It is based in Tsim Sha Tsui, Hong Kong and would be a member of APRALO if accepted.
Please find the application form attached. The regional liaison for Asia Pacific has been informed and will provide us with due diligence for this application in due course.
-- Regards,
Heidi Ullrich, Gisella Gruber-White, Seth Greene, Marilyn Vernon ICANN At-Large Staff
_______________________________________________