Por favor me urde tener el documento disponible en español de El Grupo de Trabajo de Revisión ALAC - proyecto de Informe Final [PDF, 309K] sobre las mejoras ALAC. Más detalles de la revisión puede ALAC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacqueline A. Morris" <jam@jacquelinemorris.com> To: "At-Large Worldwide" <at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 7:16 PM Subject: Re: [At-Large] Auerbach: "It is my view that ICANN ought to scrapthe ALAC in its entirety"
Clarification - not at the same time - all At Large members and non-members can be proposed for the ALAC and be voted or appointed one of the 15 Jacqueline A. Morris wrote:
As far as I know the At Large list (this list on which we are currently posting) is open to all who are willing to join. The ALAC is a committee that consists of 15 members, some chosen by the NomCom and some chosen by the regions. So most people who are in the At Large will not be able to be members of the ALAC (restricted to 15 persons) Jacqueline Elisabeth Porteneuve wrote:
I concur wholeheartedly with Karl's notes. I have been here for ICANN and DNSO creation, five long years, and should not have much difficulty to follow or catch up with its organizations or committees. Still, I cannot comprehend ALAC. Sometimes I wonder if ALAC, or At Large, or whatever acronym used here and designating something in a dark forest of its labyrinthine form, have been formed to prevent good people to discuss Internet matters together, learn, share and rise important issues.
"The current ALAC was a step backwards from the system that it replaced. That prior system self-organized and self-funded itself into a vibrant system of debate and information exchange. ICANN merely ran the election machinery. In that system the public itself nominated and elected people onto the ICANN Board of Directors, a far cry from the thickly insulating committee upon committee upon committee intricacy of the present ALAC."
In early ICANN's days we had the GA "ga" list, open to anyone willing to join. I still do not know if I am legitimate person on this ALAC, At Large or whatever acronym list. And yes, I am that pesky individual, only individual, not accepting to be segregated into geographic boxes.
Thanks Karl, thanks Danny.
Elisabeth Porteneuve
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:30:46 -0800 (PST)
My thanks to Karl for his honest assessment of what ought to be done with the ALAC. You may read the ALAC Review WG Draft Final Report (along with Karl's comments) here: http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-11feb09-en.htm
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann...
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann...
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org