I tend to agree with Johan. As I discussed in a different mailing list, my personal opinion is that to have three large worldwide meetings is no longer a sustainable model, so I believe that ICANN should start discussing whether we could use a different approach. It is OK to have one AGM to be held as much as possible in person. We can have another large online meeting, and then use the funds to have more regional meetings. Cheers, Roberto
On 10.04.2020, at 13:08, Johan Helsingius <julf@julf.com> wrote:
On 10-04-2020 11:21, Wolfgang Kleinwächter wrote:
I did this proposed already after virtuel@Cancun67: Lets reform the ICANN Meeting Strategy: One Spring and one Fall ICANN Meeting F2F, and one virtual meeting in the summer.
Or even just one annual F2F. Most of the real work is in WGs anyway.
Julf
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.