Re: [At-Large] Global Fellowships Program

May 14, 2007

      Hi Khaled,

Each region that has formed as a RALO already has governance principles
in place that allow it to take decisions. In the eventuality that we
decide to go ahead with the scheme I propose, it would be up to each
region to decide how they select the people who will attend meetings
using criteria allowing them to implement the values they wish to
promote,

_________________________________________
Luc Faubert
Conseiller en gouvernance TI et en gestion du changement /
IT governance and change management consulting 
+1 514 236 5129
www.LucFaubert.com <http://www.lucfaubert.com/> 
www.LucFaubert.com/blog
www.isoc.qc.ca <http://www.isoc.qc.ca/> 
www.ccig.ca <http://www.ccig.ca/> 
www.uqbm.qc.ca <http://www.uqbm.qc.ca/> 
www.maillons.qc.ca <http://www.maillons.qc.ca/>  

________________________________

	From: Khaled KOUBAA [mailto:khaled.koubaa@gmail.com] 
	Sent: 13 mai 2007 23:12
	To: jam@jacquelinemorris.com
	Cc: Luc Faubert; nick.ashton-hart@icann.org; 'At-Large
Worldwide'
	Subject: Re: [At-Large] Global Fellowships Program

	Hi Luc,
	Nice idea.
	And I have a question to try to go forward with your proposition
:
	Who in the region decides who will go ? and according to which
process and policy ? and transparancy !
	Best

	Khaled

	Jacqueline A. Morris wrote: 

		Hi Luc
		Interesting idea - we can talk about it in San Juan?
		Jacqueline

		-----Original Message-----
		From: Luc Faubert [mailto:LFaubert@conceptum.ca] 
		Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 9:04 AM
		To: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org; karen banks
		Cc: At-Large Worldwide
		Subject: Re: [At-Large] Global Fellowships Program

		Hi Nick,

		Wouldn't it be best to have At-Large people from all
regions to every
		meeting? We could do something like this:

		- ICANN decides to fund travel for a constant number of
x At-Large
		individuals to every meeting,
		- x is distributed among the five regions proportionnaly
to its number
		of registered ALS,
		- Each region then decides who will go (max. 1
individual/ALS) + 1
		unaffiliated user.

		The number x could be revised annually to take into
account the growth
		of ALS certifications.

		This would all be independent of the Fellowships
program.

		Regards,

		_________________________________________
		Luc Faubert
		Conseiller en gouvernance TI et en gestion du changement
/
		IT governance and change management consulting 
		+1 514 236 5129
		www.LucFaubert.com
		www.LucFaubert.com/blog
		www.isoc.qc.ca
		www.ccig.ca
		www.uqbm.qc.ca
		www.maillons.qc.ca 

			-----Original Message-----
			From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org 
			[mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On
Behalf Of 
			Nick Ashton-Hart
			Sent: 11 mai 2007 08:34
			To: karen banks
			Cc: At-Large Worldwide
			Subject: Re: [At-Large] Global Fellowships
Program

			Sorry, I think there is a misunderstanding here.
My apologies 
			for helping to create one.

			For the regional meetings, EACH ALS may
designate one 
			delegate. This means that not one or two people
are coming 
			from the regions, but much larger numbers.

			As to who chooses to go: each ALS chooses who
their delegate is.

			On 11/05/07, karen banks <karenb@gn.apc.org>
<mailto:karenb@gn.apc.org>  wrote:

				hi nick

				There is nothing official posted, but
how it is working is 

			like this:

				At each international meeting, at least
one At-Large region is 
				invited to send one delegate per
At-Large Structure to a regional 
				meeting at the ICANN Meeting. This is in
addition to the 

			members of 

				the ALAC, who are also subsidised to
attend each 

			International Meeting.

				The region or regions to be invited is
based upon where the 
				international meeting is located. So,
for San Juan, we 

			have LAC and 

				North America coming, for Lisbon it was
Europe and Africa. 

			For Asia 

				it will be just the
Asia/Australia/Pacific ALSes who will 

			be attending I believe.

				thanks for this.. so, the ALAC members
attend all meetings, and then
				1 or 2 other folk woulc come along
depending on the region 

			of meeting?

				and, the process for deciding who goes..
is that rather 

			informal also? 

				or is that a formal ALAC committee
procedure?

				sorry for so many questions, but the
fellowship announcement has 
				encouraged people to think about
attending ICANN meetings, but 
				naturally, ALAC is a comfort zone for
many of the people we 

			work with

				karen

			--
			--
			Regards,

			Nick Ashton-Hart
			PO Box 32160
			London N4 2XY
			United Kingdom
			UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011
			USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460
			Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135
			mobile: +44 (7774) 932798
			Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight:
nashtonhart@mac.com /
			Skype: nashtonhart
			Online Bio:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

			_______________________________________________
			ALAC mailing list
			ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org

http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-l

		ists.icann.org

			www.alac.icann.org
			www.icannalac.org

		_______________________________________________
		ALAC mailing list
		ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org

http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann
.org

		www.alac.icann.org
		www.icannalac.org

		No virus found in this incoming message.
		Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
		Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.8/797 - Release
Date: 5/10/2007
		5:10 PM

		No virus found in this outgoing message.
		Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
		Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.8/797 - Release
Date: 5/10/2007
		5:10 PM

		_______________________________________________
		ALAC mailing list
		ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org

http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann
.org

		www.alac.icann.org
		www.icannalac.org