Re: [At-Large] Global Fellowships Program
Sorry, I think there is a misunderstanding here. My apologies for helping to create one. For the regional meetings, EACH ALS may designate one delegate. This means that not one or two people are coming from the regions, but much larger numbers. As to who chooses to go: each ALS chooses who their delegate is. On 11/05/07, karen banks <karenb@gn.apc.org> wrote:
hi nick
There is nothing official posted, but how it is working is like this:
At each international meeting, at least one At-Large region is invited to send one delegate per At-Large Structure to a regional meeting at the ICANN Meeting. This is in addition to the members of the ALAC, who are also subsidised to attend each International Meeting.
The region or regions to be invited is based upon where the international meeting is located. So, for San Juan, we have LAC and North America coming, for Lisbon it was Europe and Africa. For Asia it will be just the Asia/Australia/Pacific ALSes who will be attending I believe.
thanks for this.. so, the ALAC members attend all meetings, and then 1 or 2 other folk woulc come along depending on the region of meeting?
and, the process for deciding who goes.. is that rather informal also? or is that a formal ALAC committee procedure?
sorry for so many questions, but the fellowship announcement has encouraged people to think about attending ICANN meetings, but naturally, ALAC is a comfort zone for many of the people we work with
karen
-- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
hi nick
Sorry, I think there is a misunderstanding here. My apologies for helping to create one.
good to talk it through.. i hope i'm not the only one who doesn't know how these things work!
For the regional meetings, EACH ALS may designate one delegate. This means that not one or two people are coming from the regions, but much larger numbers.
you mean every ALS? but, isn't that in theory an infiinite number? i mean, how does ALAC manage a budget for an unknown quantity such as number of ALSs' ? (should i take this offline?)
As to who chooses to go: each ALS chooses who their delegate is.
yes, well that would make sense, just wondering about the money but, what it does mean in principle, is that you can only get funding to attend ICANN through ALAC is you are a member of an ALS yes? this also sheds a bit of light on the suggestion from adam to add a fund to the ICANN general grant - they are clearly for different types of purpose - but, it makes me wonder about people who are potentially interested in ALAC, and may not be able to find their way in via an ALS.. maybe (in future, for discussion etc) there's scope for the odd grant to cover these people.. karen karen
Member of the RALO , either ALS or individual - some RALOs have individual members (we haven't seen this yet, but NARALO will have individual members - not sure how they will pick their reps to attend - I doubt that each individual member will be able to attend, probably more likely a person or 2 to represent the individuals ) For the other regions, I'm not sure how individuals are represented (would need to look at all the documents, as it's different in each region). It's potentially infinite, yes. But right now it's quite manageable. As we grow, we will have to really consider how we do this. Jacqueline -----Original Message----- From: karen banks [mailto:karenb@gn.apc.org] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 8:55 AM To: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org Cc: At-Large Worldwide Subject: Re: [At-Large] Global Fellowships Program hi nick
Sorry, I think there is a misunderstanding here. My apologies for helping to create one.
good to talk it through.. i hope i'm not the only one who doesn't know how these things work!
For the regional meetings, EACH ALS may designate one delegate. This means that not one or two people are coming from the regions, but much larger numbers.
you mean every ALS? but, isn't that in theory an infiinite number? i mean, how does ALAC manage a budget for an unknown quantity such as number of ALSs' ? (should i take this offline?)
As to who chooses to go: each ALS chooses who their delegate is.
yes, well that would make sense, just wondering about the money but, what it does mean in principle, is that you can only get funding to attend ICANN through ALAC is you are a member of an ALS yes? this also sheds a bit of light on the suggestion from adam to add a fund to the ICANN general grant - they are clearly for different types of purpose - but, it makes me wonder about people who are potentially interested in ALAC, and may not be able to find their way in via an ALS.. maybe (in future, for discussion etc) there's scope for the odd grant to cover these people.. karen karen _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org www.alac.icann.org www.icannalac.org No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.8/797 - Release Date: 5/10/2007 5:10 PM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.8/797 - Release Date: 5/10/2007 5:10 PM
Jaqueline, Within the Lisbon meeting we discussed within the AFRALO that there is no logic that RALO could accept individuals as members. I think that the basic existence principals of a Regional Organization is to group Local Organization. I think that if we permit that individuals may be members of a RALO, we will encourage more individuals to become members by themself then encouraging local-user organization to become ALS. I would like that ICANN decide to remove this possibility from all MoU signed or to be signed with RALOs. Best, Khaled Jacqueline A. Morris wrote:
Member of the RALO , either ALS or individual - some RALOs have individual members (we haven't seen this yet, but NARALO will have individual members - not sure how they will pick their reps to attend - I doubt that each individual member will be able to attend, probably more likely a person or 2 to represent the individuals ) For the other regions, I'm not sure how individuals are represented (would need to look at all the documents, as it's different in each region). It's potentially infinite, yes. But right now it's quite manageable. As we grow, we will have to really consider how we do this. Jacqueline
-----Original Message----- From: karen banks [mailto:karenb@gn.apc.org] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 8:55 AM To: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org Cc: At-Large Worldwide Subject: Re: [At-Large] Global Fellowships Program
hi nick
Sorry, I think there is a misunderstanding here. My apologies for helping to create one.
good to talk it through.. i hope i'm not the only one who doesn't know how these things work!
For the regional meetings, EACH ALS may designate one delegate. This means that not one or two people are coming from the regions, but much larger numbers.
you mean every ALS? but, isn't that in theory an infiinite number? i mean, how does ALAC manage a budget for an unknown quantity such as number of ALSs' ? (should i take this offline?)
As to who chooses to go: each ALS chooses who their delegate is.
yes, well that would make sense, just wondering about the money
but, what it does mean in principle, is that you can only get funding to attend ICANN through ALAC is you are a member of an ALS yes?
this also sheds a bit of light on the suggestion from adam to add a fund to the ICANN general grant - they are clearly for different types of purpose - but, it makes me wonder about people who are potentially interested in ALAC, and may not be able to find their way in via an ALS.. maybe (in future, for discussion etc) there's scope for the odd grant to cover these people..
karen
karen
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
www.alac.icann.org www.icannalac.org
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.8/797 - Release Date: 5/10/2007 5:10 PM
No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.8/797 - Release Date: 5/10/2007 5:10 PM
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
www.alac.icann.org www.icannalac.org
Hi Khaled The different regions feel differently about this issue. For this reason, each region has determined its membership rules, which may differ from other regions. Each region has its own issues and concerns and culture, and we try to let them determine how to manage these themselves as much as possible, within the basic principles of self-determination and democracy. I think it would be a very negative signal for ICANN to attempt to dictate to the regions, by inserting a clause in the MoU that says a region must have or must not have particular membership. Given that the AtLarge is to represent individual internet users, it is possible that individuals may want to participate without being forced to join an organization that is an ALS. We must have routes for participation for these individuals. I personally would love individuals to be members, but the only region that is looking at giving individual members full rights is the NARALO. I understand the issue with capture, and am as yet unsure as to how we can structure participation to avoid these issues, but it is incredibly important to me (and I hope the rest of the community) that ATLarge be as inclusive as possible, rather than rejecting anyone who wishes to participate for lack of a hosting organization. I do not believe that allowing individual membership will reduce the outreach to organizations. It is difficult to come up with a reasonable and fair structure, but I hope that NARALO will succeed at that. I also believe that given the lack of individual participation in so many of the RALOs, the ALAC will have to look at alternative mechanisms to allow individual participation, whether it be as has been suggested, a 6th global RALO for individuals or any other mechanism. We are looking at this issue. Jacqueline From: Khaled KOUBAA [mailto:khaled.koubaa@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 10:24 PM To: jam@jacquelinemorris.com Cc: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org; 'At-Large Worldwide' Subject: Re: [At-Large] Global Fellowships Program Jaqueline, Within the Lisbon meeting we discussed within the AFRALO that there is no logic that RALO could accept individuals as members. I think that the basic existence principals of a Regional Organization is to group Local Organization. I think that if we permit that individuals may be members of a RALO, we will encourage more individuals to become members by themself then encouraging local-user organization to become ALS. I would like that ICANN decide to remove this possibility from all MoU signed or to be signed with RALOs. Best, Khaled Jacqueline A. Morris wrote: Member of the RALO , either ALS or individual - some RALOs have individual members (we haven't seen this yet, but NARALO will have individual members - not sure how they will pick their reps to attend - I doubt that each individual member will be able to attend, probably more likely a person or 2 to represent the individuals ) For the other regions, I'm not sure how individuals are represented (would need to look at all the documents, as it's different in each region). It's potentially infinite, yes. But right now it's quite manageable. As we grow, we will have to really consider how we do this. Jacqueline -----Original Message----- From: karen banks [HYPERLINK "mailto:karenb@gn.apc.org"mailto:karenb@gn.apc.org] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 8:55 AM To: HYPERLINK "mailto:nick.ashton-hart@icann.org"nick.ashton-hart@icann.org Cc: At-Large Worldwide Subject: Re: [At-Large] Global Fellowships Program hi nick Sorry, I think there is a misunderstanding here. My apologies for helping to create one. good to talk it through.. i hope i'm not the only one who doesn't know how these things work! For the regional meetings, EACH ALS may designate one delegate. This means that not one or two people are coming from the regions, but much larger numbers. you mean every ALS? but, isn't that in theory an infiinite number? i mean, how does ALAC manage a budget for an unknown quantity such as number of ALSs' ? (should i take this offline?) As to who chooses to go: each ALS chooses who their delegate is. yes, well that would make sense, just wondering about the money but, what it does mean in principle, is that you can only get funding to attend ICANN through ALAC is you are a member of an ALS yes? this also sheds a bit of light on the suggestion from adam to add a fund to the ICANN general grant - they are clearly for different types of purpose - but, it makes me wonder about people who are potentially interested in ALAC, and may not be able to find their way in via an ALS.. maybe (in future, for discussion etc) there's scope for the odd grant to cover these people.. karen karen _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list HYPERLINK "mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org"ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org HYPERLINK "http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.or g"http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.o rg HYPERLINK "http://www.alac.icann.org"www.alac.icann.org HYPERLINK "http://www.icannalac.org"www.icannalac.org No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.8/797 - Release Date: 5/10/2007 5:10 PM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.8/797 - Release Date: 5/10/2007 5:10 PM _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list HYPERLINK "mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org"ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org HYPERLINK "http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.or g"http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.o rg HYPERLINK "http://www.alac.icann.org"www.alac.icann.org HYPERLINK "http://www.icannalac.org"www.icannalac.org No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.8/797 - Release Date: 5/10/2007 5:10 PM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.0/803 - Release Date: 5/13/2007 12:17 PM
Hi Nick, Wouldn't it be best to have At-Large people from all regions to every meeting? We could do something like this: - ICANN decides to fund travel for a constant number of x At-Large individuals to every meeting, - x is distributed among the five regions proportionnaly to its number of registered ALS, - Each region then decides who will go (max. 1 individual/ALS) + 1 unaffiliated user. The number x could be revised annually to take into account the growth of ALS certifications. This would all be independent of the Fellowships program. Regards, _________________________________________ Luc Faubert Conseiller en gouvernance TI et en gestion du changement / IT governance and change management consulting +1 514 236 5129 www.LucFaubert.com www.LucFaubert.com/blog www.isoc.qc.ca www.ccig.ca www.uqbm.qc.ca www.maillons.qc.ca
-----Original Message----- From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Nick Ashton-Hart Sent: 11 mai 2007 08:34 To: karen banks Cc: At-Large Worldwide Subject: Re: [At-Large] Global Fellowships Program
Sorry, I think there is a misunderstanding here. My apologies for helping to create one.
For the regional meetings, EACH ALS may designate one delegate. This means that not one or two people are coming from the regions, but much larger numbers.
As to who chooses to go: each ALS chooses who their delegate is.
On 11/05/07, karen banks <karenb@gn.apc.org> wrote:
hi nick
There is nothing official posted, but how it is working is like this:
At each international meeting, at least one At-Large region is invited to send one delegate per At-Large Structure to a regional meeting at the ICANN Meeting. This is in addition to the members of the ALAC, who are also subsidised to attend each International Meeting.
The region or regions to be invited is based upon where the international meeting is located. So, for San Juan, we have LAC and North America coming, for Lisbon it was Europe and Africa. For Asia it will be just the Asia/Australia/Pacific ALSes who will be attending I believe.
thanks for this.. so, the ALAC members attend all meetings, and then 1 or 2 other folk woulc come along depending on the region of meeting?
and, the process for deciding who goes.. is that rather informal also? or is that a formal ALAC committee procedure?
sorry for so many questions, but the fellowship announcement has encouraged people to think about attending ICANN meetings, but naturally, ALAC is a comfort zone for many of the people we work with
karen
-- -- Regards,
Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-l ists.icann.org
www.alac.icann.org www.icannalac.org
Hi Luc Interesting idea - we can talk about it in San Juan? Jacqueline -----Original Message----- From: Luc Faubert [mailto:LFaubert@conceptum.ca] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 9:04 AM To: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org; karen banks Cc: At-Large Worldwide Subject: Re: [At-Large] Global Fellowships Program Hi Nick, Wouldn't it be best to have At-Large people from all regions to every meeting? We could do something like this: - ICANN decides to fund travel for a constant number of x At-Large individuals to every meeting, - x is distributed among the five regions proportionnaly to its number of registered ALS, - Each region then decides who will go (max. 1 individual/ALS) + 1 unaffiliated user. The number x could be revised annually to take into account the growth of ALS certifications. This would all be independent of the Fellowships program. Regards, _________________________________________ Luc Faubert Conseiller en gouvernance TI et en gestion du changement / IT governance and change management consulting +1 514 236 5129 www.LucFaubert.com www.LucFaubert.com/blog www.isoc.qc.ca www.ccig.ca www.uqbm.qc.ca www.maillons.qc.ca
-----Original Message----- From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Nick Ashton-Hart Sent: 11 mai 2007 08:34 To: karen banks Cc: At-Large Worldwide Subject: Re: [At-Large] Global Fellowships Program
Sorry, I think there is a misunderstanding here. My apologies for helping to create one.
For the regional meetings, EACH ALS may designate one delegate. This means that not one or two people are coming from the regions, but much larger numbers.
As to who chooses to go: each ALS chooses who their delegate is.
On 11/05/07, karen banks <karenb@gn.apc.org> wrote:
hi nick
There is nothing official posted, but how it is working is like this:
At each international meeting, at least one At-Large region is invited to send one delegate per At-Large Structure to a regional meeting at the ICANN Meeting. This is in addition to the members of the ALAC, who are also subsidised to attend each International Meeting.
The region or regions to be invited is based upon where the international meeting is located. So, for San Juan, we have LAC and North America coming, for Lisbon it was Europe and Africa. For Asia it will be just the Asia/Australia/Pacific ALSes who will be attending I believe.
thanks for this.. so, the ALAC members attend all meetings, and then 1 or 2 other folk woulc come along depending on the region of meeting?
and, the process for deciding who goes.. is that rather informal also? or is that a formal ALAC committee procedure?
sorry for so many questions, but the fellowship announcement has encouraged people to think about attending ICANN meetings, but naturally, ALAC is a comfort zone for many of the people we work with
karen
-- -- Regards,
Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-l ists.icann.org
www.alac.icann.org www.icannalac.org
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org www.alac.icann.org www.icannalac.org No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.8/797 - Release Date: 5/10/2007 5:10 PM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.8/797 - Release Date: 5/10/2007 5:10 PM
Hi Luc, Nice idea. And I have a question to try to go forward with your proposition : Who in the region decides who will go ? and according to which process and policy ? and transparancy ! Best Khaled Jacqueline A. Morris wrote:
Hi Luc Interesting idea - we can talk about it in San Juan? Jacqueline
-----Original Message----- From: Luc Faubert [mailto:LFaubert@conceptum.ca] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 9:04 AM To: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org; karen banks Cc: At-Large Worldwide Subject: Re: [At-Large] Global Fellowships Program
Hi Nick,
Wouldn't it be best to have At-Large people from all regions to every meeting? We could do something like this:
- ICANN decides to fund travel for a constant number of x At-Large individuals to every meeting, - x is distributed among the five regions proportionnaly to its number of registered ALS, - Each region then decides who will go (max. 1 individual/ALS) + 1 unaffiliated user.
The number x could be revised annually to take into account the growth of ALS certifications.
This would all be independent of the Fellowships program.
Regards,
_________________________________________ Luc Faubert Conseiller en gouvernance TI et en gestion du changement / IT governance and change management consulting +1 514 236 5129 www.LucFaubert.com www.LucFaubert.com/blog www.isoc.qc.ca www.ccig.ca www.uqbm.qc.ca www.maillons.qc.ca
-----Original Message----- From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Nick Ashton-Hart Sent: 11 mai 2007 08:34 To: karen banks Cc: At-Large Worldwide Subject: Re: [At-Large] Global Fellowships Program
Sorry, I think there is a misunderstanding here. My apologies for helping to create one.
For the regional meetings, EACH ALS may designate one delegate. This means that not one or two people are coming from the regions, but much larger numbers.
As to who chooses to go: each ALS chooses who their delegate is.
On 11/05/07, karen banks <karenb@gn.apc.org> wrote:
hi nick
There is nothing official posted, but how it is working is
like this:
At each international meeting, at least one At-Large region is invited to send one delegate per At-Large Structure to a regional meeting at the ICANN Meeting. This is in addition to the
members of
the ALAC, who are also subsidised to attend each
International Meeting.
The region or regions to be invited is based upon where the international meeting is located. So, for San Juan, we
have LAC and
North America coming, for Lisbon it was Europe and Africa.
For Asia
it will be just the Asia/Australia/Pacific ALSes who will
be attending I believe.
thanks for this.. so, the ALAC members attend all meetings, and then 1 or 2 other folk woulc come along depending on the region
of meeting?
and, the process for deciding who goes.. is that rather
informal also?
or is that a formal ALAC committee procedure?
sorry for so many questions, but the fellowship announcement has encouraged people to think about attending ICANN meetings, but naturally, ALAC is a comfort zone for many of the people we
work with
karen
-- -- Regards,
Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-l
ists.icann.org
www.alac.icann.org www.icannalac.org
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
www.alac.icann.org www.icannalac.org
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.8/797 - Release Date: 5/10/2007 5:10 PM
No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.8/797 - Release Date: 5/10/2007 5:10 PM
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
www.alac.icann.org www.icannalac.org
Hi Khaled, Each region that has formed as a RALO already has governance principles in place that allow it to take decisions. In the eventuality that we decide to go ahead with the scheme I propose, it would be up to each region to decide how they select the people who will attend meetings using criteria allowing them to implement the values they wish to promote, _________________________________________ Luc Faubert Conseiller en gouvernance TI et en gestion du changement / IT governance and change management consulting +1 514 236 5129 www.LucFaubert.com <http://www.lucfaubert.com/> www.LucFaubert.com/blog www.isoc.qc.ca <http://www.isoc.qc.ca/> www.ccig.ca <http://www.ccig.ca/> www.uqbm.qc.ca <http://www.uqbm.qc.ca/> www.maillons.qc.ca <http://www.maillons.qc.ca/> ________________________________ From: Khaled KOUBAA [mailto:khaled.koubaa@gmail.com] Sent: 13 mai 2007 23:12 To: jam@jacquelinemorris.com Cc: Luc Faubert; nick.ashton-hart@icann.org; 'At-Large Worldwide' Subject: Re: [At-Large] Global Fellowships Program Hi Luc, Nice idea. And I have a question to try to go forward with your proposition : Who in the region decides who will go ? and according to which process and policy ? and transparancy ! Best Khaled Jacqueline A. Morris wrote: Hi Luc Interesting idea - we can talk about it in San Juan? Jacqueline -----Original Message----- From: Luc Faubert [mailto:LFaubert@conceptum.ca] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 9:04 AM To: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org; karen banks Cc: At-Large Worldwide Subject: Re: [At-Large] Global Fellowships Program Hi Nick, Wouldn't it be best to have At-Large people from all regions to every meeting? We could do something like this: - ICANN decides to fund travel for a constant number of x At-Large individuals to every meeting, - x is distributed among the five regions proportionnaly to its number of registered ALS, - Each region then decides who will go (max. 1 individual/ALS) + 1 unaffiliated user. The number x could be revised annually to take into account the growth of ALS certifications. This would all be independent of the Fellowships program. Regards, _________________________________________ Luc Faubert Conseiller en gouvernance TI et en gestion du changement / IT governance and change management consulting +1 514 236 5129 www.LucFaubert.com www.LucFaubert.com/blog www.isoc.qc.ca www.ccig.ca www.uqbm.qc.ca www.maillons.qc.ca -----Original Message----- From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Nick Ashton-Hart Sent: 11 mai 2007 08:34 To: karen banks Cc: At-Large Worldwide Subject: Re: [At-Large] Global Fellowships Program Sorry, I think there is a misunderstanding here. My apologies for helping to create one. For the regional meetings, EACH ALS may designate one delegate. This means that not one or two people are coming from the regions, but much larger numbers. As to who chooses to go: each ALS chooses who their delegate is. On 11/05/07, karen banks <karenb@gn.apc.org> <mailto:karenb@gn.apc.org> wrote: hi nick There is nothing official posted, but how it is working is like this: At each international meeting, at least one At-Large region is invited to send one delegate per At-Large Structure to a regional meeting at the ICANN Meeting. This is in addition to the members of the ALAC, who are also subsidised to attend each International Meeting. The region or regions to be invited is based upon where the international meeting is located. So, for San Juan, we have LAC and North America coming, for Lisbon it was Europe and Africa. For Asia it will be just the Asia/Australia/Pacific ALSes who will be attending I believe. thanks for this.. so, the ALAC members attend all meetings, and then 1 or 2 other folk woulc come along depending on the region of meeting? and, the process for deciding who goes.. is that rather informal also? or is that a formal ALAC committee procedure? sorry for so many questions, but the fellowship announcement has encouraged people to think about attending ICANN meetings, but naturally, ALAC is a comfort zone for many of the people we work with karen -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-l ists.icann.org www.alac.icann.org www.icannalac.org _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann .org www.alac.icann.org www.icannalac.org No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.8/797 - Release Date: 5/10/2007 5:10 PM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.8/797 - Release Date: 5/10/2007 5:10 PM _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann .org www.alac.icann.org www.icannalac.org
participants (5)
-
Jacqueline A. Morris -
karen banks -
Khaled KOUBAA -
Luc Faubert -
Nick Ashton-Hart