Izumi and all my friends, Well it is clear that the ALAC IS an organ of ICANN. The rest of your remarks and comments do not apply as you state them accordingly. However the ALAC is not responsible for ICANN's complicity as the ALAC has elected no board members, nor any GNSO members. This grave and ill considered judgment is rightly that of the ICANN Board and staff. The buck stops there regardless of where from within ICANN it originated... However again, let me be very clear as I have already questioned, it may very be that DOC/NTIA as oversight authority under the MOU, is also complicit as well though they are not "currently" named in this legal action. My guess is that in the E-Discovery phase of this legal action that some of the GNSO and its Constituency members will be named, their PC's confiscated for forensic evidence investigation, and remanded to testify as witnesses. I have been encouraging our members that were, or may have been damaged by ICANN's breach of fiduciary responsibility to come forward with any and all information or evidence in respect to this action or related to same lest they be surprised in such a way as to be a disruption to their lives accordingly. I myself am compiling an archive of any and all Emails I have sent, and I archive all of them related to ICANN, to DVD and offering that data to the current plaintiff in the case that data may be relevant. This would include all said data related to RegistryFly and GoDaddy. Izumi AIZU wrote:
I agree in principle - to hear from all sides, and then make a sound judgement based on our mission - to reflect global individual users voices on this issue and within ICANN's mandate.
If we are part of ICANN decision making process and are on the Board of ICANN, yes, we are very much responsible for the decisions it made, but if we are an advisory, that is, to some degree, different. In any case, we should consider this case on our own merit, and if we think ICANN has made a mistake, we should not hesitate to say so with firm material. BUT if not, we should not just jump in.
izumi
2008/2/27, Franck Martin <franck.martin@gmail.com>:
All before you go either way, you should get independent technical advice and legal advice.
Then form your opinion. Get both side of the story and do not jump the gun.
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Franck Martin franck.martin@gmail.com http://www.peachymango.org/ "Toute connaissance est une réponse à une question" G. Bachelard _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
-- >> Izumi Aizu <<
Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita Kumon Center, Tama University, Tokyo Japan * * * * * << Writing the Future of the History >> www.anr.org
Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827