see comments below On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Karl Auerbach <karl@cavebear.com> wrote:
ICANN's Ombudsman, Frank Fowlie, recently posted a web page on Respectful
Online Communication and Behavior
I must say that I found that to be a rather strange document.
Me too. Very strange indeed in light of some of the actions taken by ICANN staff in censoring the GA.
It posits ICANN as some fantasy world in which disinterested philosophers discuss and debate.
ICANN has always lived in a fantasy world.
That is in hard conflict with the reality of ICANN as a political cauldron in which deeply antagonistic interests contest with one another for power and profit.
No it's understandable. Those in control of ICANN want to remain in control. They don't want new ideas to cloud the bureaucracy they are building. Most of the world realize that ICANN is a failed business model. I think ICANN was to in any way deflect as much criticism as it can so to maintain it's position.
Many actors within ICANN could be in violation of the ethical requirements of their professions were they to trim the sails of their advocacy on behalf of their clients to conform with that document.
They are. I'm a monitor of the GA and recently we had an ICANN staff member trying to influence peddle the removal of another members. Contrary to the chair and GA rules - members were removed from the GA by ICANN staff. Very inappropriate. It's all archived on the GA list if anyone is interested. cheers joe baptista -- Joe Baptista www.publicroot.org PublicRoot Consortium ---------------------------------------------------------------- The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive, Representative & Accountable to the Internet community @large. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Office: +1 (360) 526-6077 (extension 052) Fax: +1 (509) 479-0084