Well, apart from ALAC getting it wrong in that case, whether one reads .amazon or .health, the arguments of the so-called ICC 'experts' lack conviction. Such stuff does ICANN no credit. CW PS: The privatisation, through the DNS, of generic and geographical terms is wrong in principle. On 30 Jan 2014, at 19:45, Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org> wrote:
On 30 January 2014 13:19, Darlene Thompson <thompson.darlene@gmail.com>wrote:
There is SO much misinformation given here from EBW that I won't even start. I am copying this message to Evan and Carlton who were personally slandered and misquoted herein.
No worries. I just consider the source. Life is too short to get caught up in bitterness or name-calling.
As for the core point, the issue was one in which all of At-Large was invited to participate; subsequently ALAC decided as a group, after long consideration and a very detailed process, not to proceed with an objection against .amazon.
- Evan _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org