I agree in principle - to hear from all sides, and then make a sound judgement based on our mission - to reflect global individual users voices on this issue and within ICANN's mandate. If we are part of ICANN decision making process and are on the Board of ICANN, yes, we are very much responsible for the decisions it made, but if we are an advisory, that is, to some degree, different. In any case, we should consider this case on our own merit, and if we think ICANN has made a mistake, we should not hesitate to say so with firm material. BUT if not, we should not just jump in. izumi 2008/2/27, Franck Martin <franck.martin@gmail.com>:
All before you go either way, you should get independent technical advice and legal advice.
Then form your opinion. Get both side of the story and do not jump the gun.
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Franck Martin franck.martin@gmail.com http://www.peachymango.org/ "Toute connaissance est une réponse à une question" G. Bachelard _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
-- >> Izumi Aizu << Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita Kumon Center, Tama University, Tokyo Japan * * * * * << Writing the Future of the History >> www.anr.org