Dear Joanna, Thank you for sharing this with us ;-). This seems like a very general letter with no real substantive content just repeating what the GAC (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/ismail-to-chalaby-24apr... NTIA (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/redl-to-chalaby-04apr19...) already said. I even enjoyed the statement from the EC (https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-epdp-recs-04mar19/attachments/201904...) more because the content of it was in a much more substantive manner. By the way - if anybody is interested, I wrote my entire diploma thesis about this topic (The Future of WHOIS - An analysis of the Policy Development Process under the GDPR with a focus on the litigation ICANN v. EPAG): https://unipub.uni-graz.at/download/pdf/3703735 Have a nice day! Best, Matthias _________________________ Ing. Mag. Matthias M. Hudobnik HYPERLINK "mailto:matthias@hudobnik.at"matthias@hudobnik.at HYPERLINK "http://www.hudobnik.at/"http://www.hudobnik.at Von: At-Large [mailto:at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Joanna Kulesza Gesendet: Mittwoch, 03. Juli 2019 13:19 An: at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org Betreff: [At-Large] G7 GAC and WHOIS - protecting end users Dear all, thought this might be of interest to better understand and substantiate user interests in the WHOIS/GDPR/UAM debate: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/green-to-chalaby-21jun1... Looking forward to hearing your thoughts. -- Kind regards, Joanna Kulesza ------------------- Joanna Kulesza, PhD University of Lodz, Poland ALAC / EURALO / Capacity Building Working Group Co-Chair SOI: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Joanna+Kulesza+SOI TT: @KuleszaJ