I have seen your postings. I think these comments are referring to the number of ALSes participating in the discussion rather than suggesting that none at all have participated. On 13 Sep 2007, at 21:09, Seth M. Reiss wrote:
Nick
Trouble is, even though Randy and I made the effort the review and give our sincere input respecting Vittorio's drafts, those commenting on the lack of ALS input seem to have missed our participation entirely! I wonder if only we can see the messages we post??? A new technological innovation perhaps?
Seth
From: Nick Ashton-Hart [mailto:nick.ashton-hart@icann.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 8:57 PM To: RJGlass | America@Large Cc: Vittorio Bertola; seth.reiss@lex-ip.com; At-Large Worldwide Subject: Re: [At-Large] ALAC submission to the RAA consultation
All the regions are collaborating together on the RAA WG to put a statement together, which is what Vittorio is speaking of below.
On 12 Sep 2007, at 21:06, RJGlass | America@Large wrote:
Hi,
I thought the NARALO put something in or was working toward doing so.
I don't know if this is the same discussion, please clarify.
Thanks, Randy
On 9/12/07, Vittorio Bertola <vb@bertola.eu> wrote: All,
I (and the working group) are still waiting to know who will take over the responsibility of finalizing the ALAC submission to the consultation on the revision of the RAA.
Pardon me if I insist, but it is very important that the ALAC submits its contribution in the next few days (the formal deadline was September 10). With the collective input of the group, I already drafted a 7- page document which is almost complete - there is the need for a few hours' work of revision incorporating the last round of comments, and then for formal approval by the ALAC with whatever procedure the ALAC wants to apply (I had asked for information about the procedure weeks ago, but I don't think I had any reply).
Given that the ALAC wants to mark a sharp change of direction, I do not think that it would be useful for me to continue leading this effort - it would not bring to anything that the ALAC can agree with. Unfortunately, apart from a few replies by Jacqueline, no ALAC member is participating to this working group or has submitted any comments on this issue, so there is no natural candidate. Perhaps the new Board liaison can spare a few hours of her time in the next 2-3 days to take care of this?
Regards, -- vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <-------- --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge- lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
-- ------------------------- AmericaAtLarge.org RJPacific.com DDMF.org _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge- lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
-- Regards,
Nick Ashton-Hart Director, At-Large ICANN Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +41 (22) 595 85 44 mobile: +41 (79) 595 54 68 email: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
-- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +41 (22) 595 85 44 mobile: +41 (79) 595 54 68 email: nashton@consensus.pro Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart