Wendy Seltzer ha scritto:
I propose the following for the lists @atlarge-lists.icann.org:
alac -- public archive, open membership, list for general ALAC business. Open for posting to any interested party (including the memberships of *-Discuss and *-ALS).
We might try that - as the number of subscribers grow, maybe we'll feel the need for a separate alac-only list, to discuss our own matters in public but without getting them lost in the overall traffic - assuming, as I said, that traffic develops.
alac-internal -- ALAC members only, no public archive, LIMITED use (e.g., what time's the conference call)
regional lists -- at the option of regions' ALSs and individuals, for discussion of region-specific business. Publicly archived; open or closed at regions' option. For NA, I propose consolidation down to NA-Discuss, open membership.
I think this is a good idea, and membership could be totally free, so we could have non-ALS individuals, more than one member per ALS, etc Possibly, we might keep the -ALS list as a closed instrument for cases in which formal one-way communication from ICANN to the ALSes has to happen (e.g. call for nominations, etc.). -- vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <-------- --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------