I thought a criminal was someone convicted of a crime by a court. On May 14, 2012, at 2:18 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
The sentence you quote essentially says "The RT is in favour of the status quo".
No, it's in favor of doing what ICANN has sort of said they'd do but never actually done. I think a 3rd party rule would be nice, but I'd rather have useful data without it than the current half-useless data with it.
(I do, however, believe that the whois is a privacy disaster
The anonymity for criminals with vanity domains argument is so 20th century.
R's, John _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org