On 30 October 2012 13:18, John R. Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
IMO, this is a very important case being argued in the U.S. Supreme Court.
I suppose, but what possible connection does it have to domain names or IP addresses?
Just another example of over-reaching apparent self-entitlement of rights holders, I guess. Without reacting in detail, I don't see how the publisher can win. How can you violate COPYright when the alleged act in question provably doesn't involve copying? - Evan
Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
-- Evan Leibovitch Toronto Canada Em: evan at telly dot org Sk: evanleibovitch Tw: el56