At 19:19 16/12/2008, Ross Rader wrote:
On Dec 16, 2008, at 1:15 PM, JFC Morfin wrote:
I afraid that DNS is a very small part of what @large Internet lead users are interested in
That's reasonable, but ICANN isn't the place to bring those issues forward.
ICANN is supposedly in charge of IPv6 management and DNSSEC for the Legcacy Internet, which at the present time are the true key issues of the world digital ecosystem. Also, per se ICANN is _the_ Internet Governance at large problem, because of its ill positionning (what it wants to unilaterally do, the way it behaves IRT users, its relations with the US Government, the GAC international oddity) that has to be addressed. The status if ICANN and its staff hi-jacking we suffer for years should be the main issue for ALAC. If we really want to consider the DNS, then the DNS at large problem is to be considered and the TBT (technical barriers to trade), HR and WSIS violations that IDNA and Fast Crack represent. The problem is not to manage the ICANN DNS, but to try to preserve the world from the ICANN insolent and polluting behavior in the domain name space. jfc