I support your position Brett. We must analyze better any information, other colleagues thoughts, or even public comments about ALAC before we put our own thoughts in the list. I believe we will contribute more with our community if we use the infos we get and extract from that, the issues where we could improve or if it is not a true reality, contribute with some suggestion on how to address to the specific person or community that have raised a non proper comment, the correct answer. The list shall become a constructive way to find new paths to help ALAC continuously improve in all directions: internal capacity, representativeness, its own presence in the internet community, structure, etc. Thanks for allow me to share these thoughts with all of you. Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Alameda Santos 1470 #1407 Tel - +55113266.6253 Mob- +55118181.1464 vanda@uol.com.br Before print think about the Environment "The information contained in this message - and attached files - is restricted, and its confidentiality protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and notify the sender immediately. Please be advised that the improper use of the aforementioned information will create grounds for legal action." "As informações existentes nesta mensagem e nos arquivos anexados são para uso restrito, com sigilo protegido por lei. Caso não seja o destinatário, favor apagar esta mensagem e notificar o remetente. O uso impróprio das informações desta mensagem será tratado conforme a legislação em vigor." -----Mensagem original----- De: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome de Bret Fausett Enviada em: quarta-feira, 31 de outubro de 2007 11:27 Para: At-Large Global List Assunto: Re: [At-Large] Comments about at-large/ALAC in ICANN newsletter Robert, this post is an example of something that I think is making this list difficult to manage. The post vaguely suggests that something inappropriate has happened, based on hearsay reports from unidentified colleagues. I have no idea what you're talking about, and I think I'm rather steeped in the ICANN organization. Perhaps it would have been better to hold this message until you actually had the language in hand, could quote it and then describe your concerns. As it is, I don't know what you're talking about, even after reviewing all the recent ICANN newsletters I could find in my inbox. I'm not sure how this message accomplished anything other than to kindle some flames. I don't mean to pick on you, or anyone, I'd just like to see us use this list less as a place for instant reactions and more as a forum for considered dialogue. Bret On Oct 31, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Robert Guerra wrote:
Several colleagues are reporting that inappropriate and false information on and about at-large and ALAC meetings this week are being printed in the ICANN newsletter.
I would like to ask :
1. that the text present in the newsletter be posted to the list, and 2. should the text and/or comments be deemed as inappropriate, then ALAC should take appropriate actions
regards
Robet
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org