John and all my friends, Thanks for the link, it has been passed on to our members accordingly. My own personal *unfettered* comments are: 1.) I am not surprised at your opinion. 2.) I do not share your opinion. 3.) I am of the unqualified opinion that your position and/or opinion is an attempt to down play this class action suit and as such, perhaps desire to diswage the significance of likely illegal activity as if such were acceptable. It is definitely not! 4.) If ICANN and NSOL are truly intrested in stoping Frontrunning they do have the necessary tools by which to do so. Why they have not, and when they will is the central concern and likely necessity. 5.) Poo-Pooing illegal activity is definately not a reasonable position for anyone of good conscience or sound mind to take. John L wrote:
I wrote a couple of blog entries on this suit that people may find of interest, at http://weblog.johnlevine.com/2008/02/27
One word summary: fuggedaboutit.
R's, John
Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827