Oct. 26, 2019
3:56 p.m.
On 26-10-19 16:41, Peters Omoragbon wrote:
I felt there was no need for me to respond to Evan, s contribution because it made no value to the issue on hand. Seems you actually are responding, but without actually addressing his points.
If half of 60 selected delegates are absent because of institutionalised selective racial bias coloured in administrative bottlenecks, of what impact would the program have?
Evan pointed out that the cause might not be racial bias. I think it would help to be fact-based instead of resorting to pure rhetoric and accusations based on assumptions. Julf