Dear Vanda: I agree with you. That is, once we accept that ICANN is a regulator! [I credit the writer for being consistent in recognition.] Not our Uncle Sam though. He simply will not say it's so. In my corner of empire we describe this as wanting to eat your cake and cut your calories at the same time. -Carlton On Tue, 30 Oct 2018, 1:52 pm Vanda Scartezini, <vanda@scartezini.org> wrote:
Dear Carlton , all Though ICANN is a private organization and could do whatever it want , at the same time it has a peculiar position as a “ regulatory” entity and as such higher level employees has access to quite confidential aspects of concurrent business and once out of ICANN joining just one of these companies with the knowledge of all in the market is quite an unfair situation and on my opinion would demand some quarantine of at least6 months as is normally demanded for high level government employees
Vanda Scartezini Sent from my iPhone Sorry for typos
On 29 Oct 2018, at 21:48, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com> wrote:
https://domainnamewire.com/2018/10/29/u-s-government-follows-up-on-cooling-o...
============================== *Carlton A Samuels*
*Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org