Dev, Two brief comments. 1. I understand that there is a process underway to address and hopefully fix some of the root causes of the issues you refer to. I am afraid that this is currently been carried out within ICANN staff and I cannot provide further details other than to say something is happening. 2. I am not in a position to predict outcomes, but I do plan to include the issue you raise in your second bullet, the ability to address RALO disputes at the ALAC level, will be raised during a forthcoming review and update of the ALAC Rules of Procedure. Alan At 18/02/2016 01:27 PM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh wrote:
Please find attached a statement by several At-Large Structures on the issues regarding lack of Accountability and Transparency in LACRALO which makes some suggestions on the way forward.
The statement can also be viewed at https://www.dropbox.com/s/yi7ra2g8ymox9n6/Issues-regarding-Lack-of-Accountab...
This statement was sent during the ICANN54 Dublin meeting in October 2015 to the regional GSE, Staff, the ALAC chair, the Ombudsman and the ICANN Board member selected by At-Large"
It is being made public now before the ICANN Marrakech meeting in order to ensure that the FACTS are made known in advance of any discussions in Marrakesh, and so that no misrepresentation occurs.
Kind Regards,
Dev Anand Teelucksingh
Content-Type: application/pdf; name=
"Issues-regarding-Lack-of-Accountability-and-Transparency-in-LACRALO.pdf" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=
"Issues-regarding-Lack-of-Accountability-and-Transparency-in-LACRALO.pdf" X-Attachment-Id: f_iksbf8tl0
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en