Avri, Thanks for the clarification. I don't have qualms about the meetings being listened to. There might be some concerns about logistics, particularly for live streaming and/or room size for in-person meetings (I'd have no clue how big a room to reserve myself). Pragmatically speaking, would making transcripts of the meetings publicly available be sufficient? Regards, -drc On Mar 4, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
Hi,
Open in the sense of being listened to, was my point. I was not necessarily thinking of the LA sessions, especially, being physically open.
avri
On 4 Mar 2013, at 17:16, David Conrad wrote:
Hi,
Just so I understand: the desire is to have meetings be open to anyone? Does this also hold true for the in-person meetings?
Thanks, -drc
_______________________________________________ atrt2 mailing list atrt2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2