David, It seemed to work well. And I meant to say "a summary of closed sessions..." Sent from my iPhone On Feb 22, 2013, at 6:30 PM, "David Conrad" <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:
Brian,
On Feb 22, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Brian Cute <brianacute@gmail.com> wrote:
As a point of reference, ATRT1 established a rule of open and transparent meetings and work. The Team established the possibility of "closed session" with Chatham House Rule if necessary but to also provide a summary or closed sessions for the community/public.
That seems eminently reasonable. Were there any negative repercussions that the first ATRT experienced that would suggest we not follow this rule with ATRT2?
Thanks, -drc
_______________________________________________ atrt2 mailing list atrt2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2