I agree that making it not binary helps. There are some editing slips on the DRC version (missing question 15, as an examplo). Anyway it seems to be a very very comprehensive and complete questionnaire. Thanks for the huge work! best demi Quoting "David Conrad" <drc@virtualized.org>:
Hi,
Apologies for not providing these comments/edits earlier (just back from travel). The executive summary of the edits:
- tried to make the questions more quantitative by asking for a response along a scale (1 to 10). As mentioned on the call, I do not think a binary yes/no for most of the questions provides particularly useful information since I suspect most folks will want to answer "sometimes yes, sometimes no". - asked for more suggestions of metrics - various consistency and consolidation edits trying to make the questions more readable (at least for me).
With respect to the comments, I found a number of places in which I was confused about what was being referenced. Perhaps that's just me, however.
FWIW, use as you see fit.
Regards, -drc