Hi, Not really. And perhaps the difference is just a nuance. One is asking whether there are other issues the ATRT2 should be addressing. The other is asking whether we are asking all the right questions. On a visceral level, haven't you ever gone through an entire questionnaire only to feel that it did not ask you the most important question? It is also an intersting metric/indicator on a questionnaire. If it remains blank, or is only answered trivially, it tends to indicate that the questionnaire hits the most important questions. If you hate the question about questions that much, and I admit it is more of a meta-question (question about the questions), I won't protest though I think it is a question that belongs there. It sort of admits that even in creating a questionnaire we are accountable to the public for correction. But it is your call. avri On 30 Mar 2013, at 09:00, Brian Cute wrote:
Avri,
I added your question re: the PDP. Upon further review, the question on Improving Accountability and Transparency near the end of the document is drafted as a "catch all." I revised it to add the word "questions" that the ATRT2 should be reviewing. Does that sufficiently capture the question your were trying to pose?
Carlos,
I edited question #10 to read "ICANN" instead of "ICANN community." Is that consistent with your intent?
I would like this to be the last revision so we can get the questions published. Please respond rapidly.
Regards, Brian
On 3/30/13 8:04 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri@ella.com> wrote:
On 30 Mar 2013, at 00:20, Brian Cute wrote:
Avri,
Leaving out the last question was an oversight. I can insert it in the final version.
Thanks
Is the edit to your question re: Staff and the PDP satisfactory or do you have a proposed construction?
Does the following (or some variant) work?
What is your assessment of ICANN Staff adherence to the policy decisions of the ICANN Policy Development Process in its operational activities. Has ICANN Staff been accountable to the ICANN community in its activities? Can you give examples of where ICANN Staff has restricted its decision-making to the boundaries set by the Policy Development Processes? Can you give examples where ICANN Staff has gone beyond the ICANN Community Policy Development Process to either make new policy or replace existing policy without Community development process or consultation? Are there specific accountability issues the ATRT2 should explore related to ICANN Staff's interactions with the Community Policy Development Process?
Thanks
avri
Thanks.
Brian
On 3/29/13 10:40 PM, "Avril Doria" <avri@acm.org> wrote:
hi,
I was not able to open what I received, but I was able to pull it from the archive.
Re 9.1 (e)
" To what extent has ICANN Staff been bound its decision-making by the ICANn Policy Development Process? " " To what extent has ICANN Staff been accountable in its decision-making? "
_______________________________________________ atrt2 mailing list atrt2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
<Structuring Public Comment Questions - v4.docx>_______________________________________________ atrt2 mailing list atrt2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2