The language is fine for me. My consideration of raising it is for the development of ICANN. I think the discussion around this issue is useful. 发件人: atrt2-bounces@icann.org [mailto:atrt2-bounces@icann.org] 代表 Brian Cute 发送时间: 2013年12月20日 0:28 收件人: atrt2@icann.org (atrt2@icann.org) 主题: [atrt2] Prioritization All, I have been following the discussion on this point. Here is what I suggest and I am interested in feedback. ATRT2 adds a statement to the Report to this effect: "ATRT2 believes that these Recommendations are important and, to the extent accepted by the Board, should be treated as a strategic priority. To that end, ICANN should create an implementation plan and publish it to the Community." A few observations when considering this statement. It is appropriate, as ICANN continues to mature, that the organization treat Review Team recommendations that it accepts as strategic priority items. It is also appropriate to expect the organization to develop and implementation plan, publish it, execute and measure (with metrics, KPIs, benchmarks etc.) its implementation performance. Staff and Board have indicated that there are already some projects underway that map to Recommendations. That is a good thing. Mr. Zhang does raise a valid, practical point (supported by David Conrad). Are we asking ICANN to implement all of these Recommendations with the same level of prioritization and at the same time? This could be an impractical request. I would think that, in the normal course, if ICANN develops and implementation plan it will identify the effort and resources necessary to implement the Recommendations and that implementation of the Recommendations will vary to some degree. I think for all these reasons, the statement about may be useful to include in the Report. Regards, Brian